Pan Enterprise Solutions, the software arm of Pan Innovation House · based in Gaziantep, Türkiye, with a London office
We do not replace your accounting backbone, whether it is Logo, Mikro, Netsis (widely used Turkish ERPs), SAP or CanIAS. We take project-based manufacturing — where quote costs come out of Excel and the foreman's experience, where finding out which machine or subcontractor a part is at means picking up the phone, where welding and inspection records sit in binders — and move it into a single real-time, traceable operational layer with clear costs. Not an off-the-shelf package — built for your business. The source code we write and your data are handed over to you as defined in the contract.
Asking about price? We listen to the scope in a short call and share the budget frame and timeline in writing. The first 30-minute call is free; the scope of an on-site discovery, and its fee if any, is agreed in writing during that call.
We work on site for plants in and around Gaziantep; elsewhere in Türkiye and abroad, discovery starts by video call and a visit is planned if needed. Our London office is at Unit 6 Cranford Way, Hornsey, London N8 9DG.
In machinery manufacturing and metalworking the finance backbone is usually settled in an ERP; but in project-based manufacturing, quote costing, shop-floor tracking and traceability run outside the system. If the points below sound familiar, the issue is not replacing your ERP but building the right layer on top of it.
The sector's software landscape is heavily layered: a horizontal accounting/ERP backbone, sector-specific technical tools (CAD, CAM, nesting) and shop-floor monitoring systems bolted on later. Each layer does its own job well, but the bridge between them is usually missing; data is carried by hand, and cost and traceability fall into the gap. Let us set out the real picture as it is, so it is clear where the solution fits.
| Layer | Software in use today | The gap it leaves |
|---|---|---|
| General ERP / accounting and stock (horizontal backbone) | Logo Tiger 3 / Logo Netsis 3 (Standard/Enterprise), Mikro Jump/Fly, SAP Business One, Login ERP, DİA, Aaro, Zirve Üretim, ETA, True ERP, Canias ERP (IAS) | Solid for current accounts, e-invoice/e-despatch note, general ledger, stock, purchasing and sales invoicing; because of Revenue Administration (GİB) obligations this backbone is fixed. Logo and Mikro are common among Turkish SMEs, while SAP B1 and Canias appear more in corporate firms. In most installations only the accounting-stock side is active; the production/MRP modules are used partially or never switched on. |
| Production/MRP, work orders and bills of materials (BOM) | Logo Netsis Üretim/MRP, Login ERP machinery module (product configurator), DİA Üretim, Aaro recipe/MRP, Zirve Üretim, MAS Üretim, Skala, Prodio, Net-X ERP (Netadam) | Designed for BOMs, route-based operation tracking, MRP and costing by production order. But because a BOM is hard to define up front in project-based one-off manufacturing, in practice these modules are used incompletely or under strain; actual costs never fully reach the system. |
| CAD (design) and PDM/PLM | SolidWorks, Autodesk Inventor, AutoCAD, Solid Edge, CATIA; on the PDM side, SolidWorks PDM, Autodesk Vault | Standard for 3D part/assembly design, manufacturing drawings and assembly structures; SolidWorks is the most widespread in machinery manufacturing. PDM/PLM (revision/version management) is mostly absent in SMEs; files are hand-named and kept in server folders, and revision chaos is born there. |
| CAM — NC programming for machining | SolidCAM (iMachining), Mastercam (including Mastercam for SolidWorks), SolidWorks CAM/CAMWorks, EdgeCAM, GibbsCAM, Esprit, Fusion 360 | Strong for toolpath and NC code generation for CNC turning, milling and vertical machining centres; SolidCAM and Mastercam dominate in Türkiye. There is usually no bridge between CAM and the ERP; real times and cost data are keyed back into production and quotes by hand. |
| Sheet-metal cutting CAD/CAM and nesting (layout/waste optimisation) | SigmaNEST, Lantek Expert, ProNest (Hypertherm), Bystronic BySoft, Trumpf TruTops, Radan | Effective for part layout on the sheet, waste reduction and NC generation from DXF for laser, plasma and press brakes; SigmaNEST is strong in Türkiye, and machine-brand software ships with the machine. The real waste and time data nesting produces is rarely connected automatically to costing and stock. |
| Quoting and cost estimation | Evobulut (online quoting), in-ERP quote modules (Logo, Mikro, True ERP, Aaro), Excel (the most common), machining cost calculators built for individual workshops | Aims to bring raw material, labour, subcontracting, overheads and margin together for customer quotes. In practice, because there is no BOM, quote costs are mostly calculated in Excel and from the foreman's experience; ERP quote modules struggle in this gap. |
| Shop-floor data collection / MES / machine monitoring (OEE, IIoT) | ProManage, Zyfra MDCplus, Kapasitematik, Getsflow, Cormind MES, EPM/idas/Pkey Labs IoT data collection, andon boards, barcode/touch operator terminals | Valuable for machine downtime/runtime, OEE, shift records and operation start/finish tracking. They are usually separate systems added after the ERP; many of the SMEs we talk to do not have them, and production is monitored on paper or Excel. |
| Quality, measurement and welding traceability | CMM device software (PC-DMIS, Calypso etc.), calibration/measurement reports; on the welding side, WPS/WPQR/pWPS document management (ISO 3834, EN 1090), 3.1 material certificate tracking | Standard for dimensional inspection, welding procedures and approval records; ISO 3834-2 and EN 1090 are mandatory for pressure-vessel, steel-structure and exporting firms. But traceability records are mostly kept in paper binders, not digitally; collecting evidence at an audit takes days. |
Product names are compiled from vendors' public pages (September 2026); PAN is not affiliated with them. The "gap" column summarises situations we commonly meet in discovery and is not a statement about any specific product.
Our solution is not a rival to your existing software; it is the operational layer that fills the disconnect between CAD, CAM, nesting and the ERP. Your accounting ERP stays as the finance backbone; we connect the quote-costing, work-order, shop-floor tracking, subcontractor and traceability side to it. We start with an on-site survey, then build only the modules you genuinely need.
A middle layer that automatically transfers the SolidWorks BOM and the real operation times and waste data from SolidCAM/Mastercam/SigmaNEST into ERP work orders and costing. The same information is entered in one place, double data entry is reduced, and quote costs are fed with real data.
A shop-floor application that records every part's cutting, machining, welding, assembly and subcontracting stage in real time via tablets or QR/barcode terminals. It delivers real labour hours and live delivery estimates, closing the gap your existing ERP module leaves unfilled.
An engine that aggregates raw material, labour, subcontracting and overheads from the actual hours, waste and subcontracting data of similar past work orders; pulls current exchange rates to produce foreign-currency quotes; and links the quote-order-production chain. Costing now lives in the system, not in the foreman's head.
A module that tracks the dispatch, return, subcontracting cost and quality record of parts sent out, and gives subcontractors shared visibility of deadlines. Lost parts and delays decrease, and month-end subcontractor reconciliation stops being an argument.
A module that links welding WPS/WPQR records, welder certificates, 3.1 material certificates and CMM inspection reports to serial and part numbers, and gathers the records needed for ISO 3834 / EN 1090 audits into one report. Critical for exporters and pressure-vessel/steel-structure firms.
A management panel that collects machine downtime and runtime data via IIoT or manual terminals and delivers real-time OEE, bottleneck and delay alerts. It replaces end-of-shift Excel reports and shows in real time where production is stuck.
No firm needs all of them. After the survey we start where it hurts most and grow module by module. The scope is set in discovery; modules are designed to fit your ERP and your floor.
A shop-floor system that tracks cutting, machining, welding and assembly stages by work order and part, and collects real labour hours and machine and operator productivity via QR/barcode terminals.
Detailed page → APIA one-way/two-way integration layer connecting the SolidWorks BOM, SolidCAM/Mastercam times and SigmaNEST waste data to Logo/Mikro/Netsis/SAP work orders and costing.
Detailed page → BIDecision support that aggregates raw material, labour, subcontracting and overheads from actual historical data, produces foreign-currency quotes, and shows order profitability and actual-versus-estimated cost variance on a single screen.
Detailed page → QRA mobile shop-floor module that tracks outgoing and returning parts with QR/barcodes, measures subcontracting costs, deadlines and quality rejections, and produces month-end reconciliation and progress payments automatically.
Detailed page →A digital quality record system that links WPS/WPQR records, welder certificates, 3.1 material certificates and CMM inspection reports to serial/part numbers, and produces the audit file at the push of a button.
A simple PDM that keeps manufacturing drawings centrally under version and revision numbers and shows which drawing is current; it ends server-folder revision chaos and production from outdated revisions.
A live production panel that collects downtime, runtime and OEE data via machine counters/IIoT integration or manual terminals, with instant alerts for bottlenecks and delivery slippage.
Detailed page → CRMA module that registers every machine sold by serial number and parts structure, and tracks warranty periods, field breakdowns and spare-part history; it brings after-sales revenue and the customer relationship into the system.
Detailed page → B2BA multilingual product catalogue, foreign-currency B2B quoting and ordering infrastructure, and a spare-parts sales portal; an additional sales channel for machinery manufacturers that export.
Detailed page →Your finance and accounting backbone (Logo, Mikro, Netsis, SAP or CanIAS) stays in place; your e-invoice, e-despatch note and current-account order is never disturbed. The operational layer we build connects to your ERP through the routes its vendor supports (API, service layer or an approved import) and does not write directly into its database tables: current accounts, stock, orders and invoices are kept in a single source of truth, and work-order, shop-floor production and subcontracting data flows into it. In the same way, CAD, CAM and nesting outputs connect to this layer as BOMs, times and waste. You neither end up with a second accounting system nor keep running the shop floor on Excel.
Our integration approach →We discuss your product range (textile/milling/packaging/agricultural machinery, pressure vessels, steel structures, automotive spare parts), your current ERP and CAD/CAM environment, and the operational point that hurts most. We clarify expectations and scope and draw a realistic frame; at this stage the priority is understanding, not selling.
We observe your cutting shop, machining centres, welding shop, assembly and subcontractor flow in place. We identify the data disconnects between Logo/Mikro/Netsis/SAP, SolidWorks, SolidCAM/Mastercam and SigmaNEST, and map the gaps in quote costing, shop-floor tracking, subcontracting and traceability.
We turn the survey findings into a prioritised roadmap: which module comes first, which integration connects where, which gain arrives earliest. We present a clear plan that protects your ERP, is module-based and phased to your budget.
We start with the module that creates the most value (usually work-order shop-floor tracking or the quote-costing engine) and develop iteratively. At the end of every sprint we show a working version; we fine-tune with feedback from foremen, operators and managers.
We commission the system on the shop floor and in the office, and train operators, foremen and managers by role. After go-live we stay at your side with maintenance, SLAs and development support. The source code we write and your data are handed over to you as defined in the contract.
We are based in Gaziantep. We write down your machine, welding-shop and subcontractor flow by listening to you on site; the starting point is your flow, not our assumptions.
Your Logo, Mikro, Netsis, SAP or CanIAS backbone stays in place. We build the operational layer that works alongside it and closes the shop-floor and costing gap; your existing order is not disturbed.
Standard MRP does not fit manufacturing where BOMs cannot be defined up front and every job is a one-off. We build the solution on work orders and actual data, and feed quote costs from past jobs.
The source code we write and your data are handed over to you as defined in the contract; third-party and open-source components remain subject to their own licences. You can continue with another team later if you wish.
We design WPS/WPQR, 3.1 material and CMM records for ISO 3834 and EN 1090 in from the start; you face export and audit demands with a system, not paper binders.
We never force you to build everything at once. We start where it hurts most, demonstrate the gain, then grow; we spread your budget across phases and lower the risk.
No. Your accounting and finance backbone stays exactly as it is; your e-invoice, e-despatch note and current-account order is not disturbed. The quote-costing, work-order, shop-floor tracking and traceability layer we build connects to your ERP through the routes its vendor supports (API, service layer or an approved import) and does not write directly into its database tables. The goal is not to build a second accounting system but to connect the shop floor and the costs the ERP cannot see.
It is built precisely for this situation. Standard MRP demands a BOM up front; in project-based manufacturing that is often impossible. We build the solution on work orders and actual data: as the part progresses on the floor, real labour hours, waste and subcontracting are recorded, and quote costs are fed from similar past jobs. Cost and delivery can then be managed even without a BOM.
Usually possible, but the route depends on the versions and export options you use; we confirm it in discovery before committing in writing. We do not replace these tools; we connect their outputs to the production and costing side. We build a bridge that transfers the SolidWorks BOM, SolidCAM/Mastercam operation times and SigmaNEST/Lantek nesting waste data to work orders and actual costs. Entering the same information into every system by hand — and the errors that come with it — is reduced.
We dispatch outgoing parts with QR/barcodes and register them on return. How much went out, how much came back, what the subcontracting cost is, which subcontractor missed a deadline and whether there was a quality rejection is visible in real time. Month-end reconciliation and progress payments are calculated automatically; the notebook-and-Excel process rests on a shared record instead.
Yes. We build a traceability module that links welding WPS/WPQR records, welder certificates, 3.1 material certificates and CMM inspection reports to serial and part numbers. When the audit comes, you can produce 'who made which weld, with which WPS and which material' as a report from the system, instead of digging through binders for days. For pressure-vessel, steel-structure and exporting firms this is a critical gain.
Yes — that is exactly our goal. With work-order-based shop-floor tracking, which machine, which subcontractor and which stage (cutting, machining, welding, assembly) every part is at appears on screen in real time. Instead of phoning around and walking the workshop, you give the customer accurate information instantly, together with a delivery estimate.
No. After the on-site survey we start with the module that creates the most value; usually that is work-order shop-floor tracking or the quote-costing engine. Once you see the gain, we add the others — the subcontractor portal, traceability, the OEE panel or the service module. We spread the budget across phases and lower the risk.
The source code we write and your data are handed over to you as defined in the contract; third-party and open-source components remain subject to their own licences. You can continue with another team later if you wish.
The scope of the quote-costing engine, the CAD/CAM and nesting tools to connect, the stations where work orders are tracked, the size of the subcontractor network, weld and material certificate traceability, and the route into your ERP. We discuss a budget range in the first call; the exact scope, timeline and price are put in writing after discovery.
One person each from planning and the workshop, examples of past quotes and completed jobs, the export options of your CAD/CAM tools, ERP connection details and a subcontractor list.
During discovery we pick a few measures, such as the gap between quoted and actual cost, delivery slippage, or how long it takes to answer 'where is my order'. We agree target values with you, based on your current data, before work begins; results are not guaranteed.
Let us observe your manufacturing in place — from the cutting shop to the welding shop, from subcontractors to dispatch. Without replacing your existing ERP, we will draw a realistic roadmap that starts where it hurts most. The first step is a discovery meeting.
